<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XML RPC using ColdFusion and Microsoft.XMLHTTP COM Object</title>
	<link>http://www.fusionteam.co.uk/blog/2008/02/19/xml-rpc-using-coldfusion-and-microsoftxmlhttp-com-object/</link>
	<description>ColdFusion, Adobe, Flex, RIA, Silverlight, Flash and all things web!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: pat branley</title>
		<link>http://www.fusionteam.co.uk/blog/2008/02/19/xml-rpc-using-coldfusion-and-microsoftxmlhttp-com-object/#comment-20</link>
		<author>pat branley</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusionteam.co.uk/blog/2008/02/19/xml-rpc-using-coldfusion-and-microsoftxmlhttp-com-object/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>There is one instance where the XMLHTTP component is usefull.  and thats when you need to interact with a IIS webserver thats using windows authentication.

normal CFHTTP can only do basic authentication. 

other than that XML RPC is way easier with CFHTTP.

Pat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one instance where the XMLHTTP component is usefull.  and thats when you need to interact with a IIS webserver thats using windows authentication.</p>
<p>normal CFHTTP can only do basic authentication. </p>
<p>other than that XML RPC is way easier with CFHTTP.</p>
<p>Pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fusion-team</title>
		<link>http://www.fusionteam.co.uk/blog/2008/02/19/xml-rpc-using-coldfusion-and-microsoftxmlhttp-com-object/#comment-19</link>
		<author>fusion-team</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusionteam.co.uk/blog/2008/02/19/xml-rpc-using-coldfusion-and-microsoftxmlhttp-com-object/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I quite agree that cfhttp would be easier, but I just wanted to show it is possible to interact with a Microsoft COM object as well to do the same job. Again user preference, but all requring roughly the same amount of code. It would be interesting to see any performance differences between the two. Anybody have such information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite agree that cfhttp would be easier, but I just wanted to show it is possible to interact with a Microsoft COM object as well to do the same job. Again user preference, but all requring roughly the same amount of code. It would be interesting to see any performance differences between the two. Anybody have such information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.fusionteam.co.uk/blog/2008/02/19/xml-rpc-using-coldfusion-and-microsoftxmlhttp-com-object/#comment-18</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusionteam.co.uk/blog/2008/02/19/xml-rpc-using-coldfusion-and-microsoftxmlhttp-com-object/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Wouldn't using CFHTTP have been easier? I don't see anything that would require the use of the COM object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t using CFHTTP have been easier? I don&#8217;t see anything that would require the use of the COM object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
